UPDATED 25/03/2009
  

Site Map
  

  Bookmark

 

 TB - DEFRA

 
 
 
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

THIS PAGE FEATURES VARIOUS ANNOUNCEMENTS
RELEASED THROUGH THE DEFRA WEBSITE....
CLICK ON ANY ITEM TO VIEW


SEE HERE FOR THE
NEW FOREST BADGER
GROUP RESPONSE TO
A BADGER CULL

  a cow


News Release-badger cull 15/12/05
The history of badger controls
Badger protection
Badgers and Bovine TB

Please note, graphics and pictures (incl. the cow) within these articles are the copyright of defra © 2006.
 

 DEFRA - News Release from December 2005

Defra homepage  

NEWS RELEASE

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR
Out of hours: 020 7270 8960

587/05

15 December 2005


DEFRA ANNOUNCES NEW MEASURES TO TACKLE BOVINE TB IN ENGLAND

New measures to tackle bovine TB in cattle in England, including the pre-movement testing of cattle and a 12-week consultation on badger culling, were announced by Defra today.

Bovine TB is a serious infectious disease of cattle, which also affects wildlife and has potential human health risks. It has been increasing at a rate of 18% a year. In 1986, 599 cattle were compulsorily slaughtered because of TB. By 2004, this had increased to 22,570.1 The disease cost the taxpayer £90.5 million last year.

The measures announced today consist of:

  • A public consultation on the principle and method of a badger culling policy in areas of high TB incidence in cattle.
  • The introduction of a requirement for pre-movement testing to reduce the spread of bovine TB through movement of cattle. This requirement will apply to cattle over 15 months of age moving out of 1 and 2 year tested herds.
  • The introduction of a new compensation scheme to bring into line payments for bovine TB and three other cattle diseases. This follows the findings of a number of independent reports showing serious overpayments under the current bovine TB compensation system.

Today’s announcement follows the publication yesterday of interim findings from the Government’s badger culling trials. It also follows a cost benefit analysis by DEFRA of a number of badger culling options drawing on all the available science up to and including the recent trials conducted in the Republic of Ireland.

Animal Health and Welfare Minister Ben Bradshaw said:

“Bovine TB has reached crisis levels in some parts of the country. It causes great distress to farmers, leads to the costly slaughter of cattle and impacts on the health and welfare of wildlife.

Experience from around the world shows that strict cattle controls are essential if TB is to be contained and eradicated. But it also shows that it is unlikely to be successful unless in addition action is taken to deal with the disease in wildlife. In this country the main wildlife reservoir is in badgers. Recent research has shown that culling badgers in hotspot areas can help reduce the disease. But there is still enough scientific uncertainty – in particular about different culling strategies – to make it important to consult on the principle as well as the method of badger controls.

Pre-movement testing is clearly necessary – particularly if we are to prevent further spread to most of the country which is TB free.

The new compensation arrangements are not only a fairer balance between the tax payer and the farmer but will encourage good husbandry.”

The consultation paper seeks views on three potential options that could be used should badger culling be introduced:

  • Individual licensing;
  • A targeted cull over specific areas linked to the incidence of TB in cattle herds;
  • A general cull over larger areas of high TB incidence.

In addition to these measures, the Government continues to pursue the development of vaccines for cattle and badgers. We will also extend the use of the gamma interferon test as an adjunct to the skin test in order to improve diagnosis of the disease.

Defra is also inviting applications for membership of a new independent stakeholder group to advise Government on bovine TB policies. A separate Press Release will follow giving further details.

1 TB Reactors plus Direct Contacts. 1986 data taken from Animal Health 1987 (The Report of the Chief Veterinary Officer). 2004 data downloaded from State Veterinary Service database on 24 November 2005. All data provisional and subject to change as more data becomes available.


Notes for Editors

Consultation on badger culling

1. A consultation on badger culling is today being launched as part of bovine TB control measures. The role of badgers in bovine TB in cattle has long been the subject of debate. The Krebs Report (1997) stated "the sum of evidence strongly supports the view that, in Britain, badgers are a significant source of infection in cattle" and this remains the position today. Now, new results from the Randomised Badger Culling ('Krebs') Trial, together with the results from the Republic of Ireland Four Area Trial and other scientific evidence has provided a basis for the Government to involve the wider public in the decision making process on badger culling. The consultation document presents the scientific evidence, looks at the balance of costs and benefits, and considers the implications of a cull for animal welfare and conservation. Further information on badgers and bovine TB including the Randomised Badger Culling Trial can be found at www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/index.htm.

2. The closing date for the consultation on badger culling is 10 March 2006. Further information including a full list of references can be found at www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/badgers-tbcontrols/index.htm, by contacting bTB.consultation@defra.gsi.gov.uk or by writing to Bovine TB and Badgers Consultation, Defra, 1a Page Street, London SW1 4PQ.

3. The Nature paper ‘Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on cattle tuberculosis’ can be obtained at http://www.doi.org using the following doi (document identification number): doi.10.1038/nature04454.

Pre-movement testing

4. There is clear evidence that movements of cattle contribute to the spread of bovine TB. Pre-movement testing will reduce the risk of spread to low incidence areas and also within high incidence areas. Following a public consultation in 2004, an independent stakeholder group chaired by dairy farmer Bill Madders made recommendations to the Chief Veterinary Officer on the introduction of a statutory requirement for pre-movement testing. The new testing requirements coming into force on the 20 th February are based largely on the group’s recommendations. Pre-movement testing will apply to cattle over 15 months of age moving from 1 and 2 year tested herds. On 1 March 2007 testing requirements will be extended to movements of cattle over 42 days old. Routine herd surveillance tests can be used as a pre-movement test as long as the animals are moved within 60 days of a clear test. Otherwise, farmers must arrange for and pay their LVI for the tests.

5. Wales will introduce pre-movement testing later in spring 2006 and Scotland introduced pre- and post-movement testing in September.

6. All cattle herd owners in GB are being sent detailed guidance on the requirements. A copy of the booklet is on Defra’s website. Background and further information on pre-movement testing is available at:

www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/premovement/index.htm

Compensation

7. Defra’s aim is to introduce a new compensation system that is fair to both cattle owners and the taxpayer. In 2003 NAO (Wales) concluded that, on average, bovine TB valuations were between 50% and 100% higher than comparable prices achieved on the open market. They also concluded that there was a similar problem with TB valuations in England. Two audits carried out by Defra’s Internal Audit (2003 and 2004) reached similar conclusions. Additionally, two studies completed by the University of Exeter and the University of Reading, concluded that some farm businesses have made a net profit from TB breakdowns.

8. From 1 February 2006, compensation for farmers whose cattle are affected by bovine TB, brucellosis and Enzootic Bovine Leukosis will be determined through a new table valuation system. For BSE, the new arrangement will be introduced at a later date. Each month an average sales price (based on one month’s data for non-pedigree cattle and six months’ data for pedigree animals) will be calculated for the 47 specified cattle categories – and these averages will constitute the compensation payment for animals in the same category.

9. Background and further information on the new compensation system is available at: www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/control/compensation.htm.


Public Enquiries: 08459 335577
Press Notices available via Defra website
www.defra.gov.uk
Defra's aim is sustainable development


 

Page Top

 DEFRA -History of badger controls (modified 19th December 2005)

Bovine TB: History of badger controls

In 1971 a dead badger infected with bovine TB (bTB) was discovered on a farm that had suffered a bTB outbreak in its cattle herd and this seemed to give backing to the theory that badgers are a cause of TB in cattle.

Over the intervening years, a number of different measures have been tried to control the disease in cattle by culling badgers. None of these was entirely successful. This is why we have now developed a much broader strategy to control cattle TB. This includes, among other things, research into how the disease is spread, development of a vaccine, and possible improvements to the testing and slaughter programme, but also trying to find out, in a scientific way, how badgers affect the disease in cattle.

This page concentrates on what has been tried in the past in relation to controlling the reservoir of bTB in the GB badger population.

The Badger Act of 1973 protected badgers from being persecuted but also allowed the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to issue licences to individuals to kill badgers to prevent the spread of disease.

Gassing

By 1975 there were concerns about the lack of controls on who could kill badgers, so MAFF decided that only its own staff, or people under its control, would be able to cull badgers to stop the spread of TB. Gassing was the method used. This was permitted under The Conservation of Wild Creatures and Wild Plants Act 1975.

Zuckerman review

Many people were not convinced that badgers spread the disease and felt that gassing was an inhumane way of controlling badgers, so, in 1980, Lord Zuckerman was asked to review the problem. Gassing operations stopped at the start of the review.

Zuckerman concluded that badgers were probably a significant source of bTB infection and that the high density and close proximity of cattle and badgers in parts of south west England made spread of the disease easy. Because the disease seemed to have spread since controls stopped at the start of the review, he advised that control measures should start again. As gassing was considered inhumane, cage trapping, followed by shooting, became the method of killing badgers.

Clean ring strategy

Zuckerman advised that areas should be cleared of infected badgers and kept clear, so from 1982 to 1985 a ‘clean ring’ strategy applied. Under this strategy, social groups of badgers on and around the breakdown farm were identified, trapped and a sample of carcases from these groups were examined. Where infection was found, all badgers in the social group were removed. The ring extended out until groups with uninfected badgers were found. Trapping took place in the cleared area for a further six months to keep the area clean.

Dunnet review

Zuckerman had recommended a further review in 3 years time. This was conducted by Professor Dunnet in 1986, who concluded that some form of badger control was unavoidable. He recommended the use of an Interim Strategy until there was:

a) sufficient data from research and badger removal operations for a further substantive review, and

b) development of a reliable live diagnostic test for bTB in badgers.

Interim strategy

This policy was introduced in 1986 and involved the removal and culling of badgers only from farms where a TB incident had been confirmed and where, following investigation, it was thought that badgers were the most likely cause of the disease.

During the operation of the interim strategy, the annual incidence of bTB has increased in South-West England and has occurred in other areas with no recent history of infection, including the West Midlands and South Wales.

Meanwhile a trial of a live badger diagnostic test was conducted between 1994 and 1996 but was stopped because of the poor sensitivity of the test and problems with the trial.

Because of the continued increase in TB in cattle, it was clear by 1996 that the interim strategy was not working so the government asked Professor John Krebs to carry out a further review.

 

Page Top

 DEFRA - Badger protection (modified 19th December 2005)

Bovine TB: Badger protection legislation

Badgers were first given protection under the Badgers Act 1973 and badger setts under the Badgers Act 1991. The Protection of Badgers Act 1992 consolidated the earlier legislation.

Summary of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992

Photo of a badger
The 1992 Act makes it an offence to:

1. kill, injure or take a badger
2. cruelly ill-treat any badger
3. interfere with a badger sett

Licensing Powers

Under the 1992 Act, licences may be issued by the Agricultural Departments (in England, this is Defra, in Wales, the National Assembly for Wales Agriculture Department and in Scotland, the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department (SEERAD)) for the following purposes;

a) to interfere with badger setts for the purpose of:

  1. any agricultural or forestry operation;
  2. any operation to maintain or improve any existing watercourse or drainage works, or to construct new works required for the drainage of land, including works of defence against seawater or tidal water;
  3. controlling foxes in order to protect livestock and penned game.

b) to kill or take badgers or to interfere with their setts for the purpose of;

  1. preventing serious damage to land, crops, poultry or any other form of property;
  2. preventing the spread of disease.

Assessing Licence Applications

In England and Wales, applications for a licence are assessed by the Rural Development Service (RDS). In Scotland, SEERAD Area Offices and Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) assess licence applications. This process involves a site visit and discussion with the applicant. These organisations will report to the relevant Animal Health Divisional Office (AHDO) in England and the Agricultural Departments in Wales and Scotland, which then determine the application.

Licences for the purpose of preventing damage will be issued where the relevant bodies are satisfied that:

  1. the level of damage is sufficiently serious to justify the issue of a licence;
  2. other methods of control have been shown to be ineffective or impractical and not just difficult to implement;
  3. licensed action will be successful in reducing any damage that might be being caused.

Although there is no provision for a closed season under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992, the badger breeding season is taken into account when determining licence applications.

Additional Licensing Authorities

English Nature, the Countryside Council for Wales and SNH, are also licensing authorities under the 1992 Act. They are responsible for the issue of licences for the following purposes:

  1. scientific or educational purposes for the conservation of badgers;
  2. any zoological gardens or collection;
  3. ringing or marking badgers;
  4. any developments as defined in S.55(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990;
  5. preservation, or archaeological investigation, of a monument scheduled under S.1 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Area Act 1970;
  6. investigating whether an offence has been committed or gathering evidence in connection with any proceedings before any Court;
  7. controlling foxes in order to protect released game or wildlife.

This is a summary only. The Protection of Badgers Act 1992 should be referred to for the exact wording.

 

Page Top

 Heading - Badgers and Bovine TB (modified 14th March 2006)

Bovine TB: Badgers and bTB

Photo of a badger


The association between bovine TB (bTB) in cattle and badgers has been a complex and contentious issue for many years. This page details the most recent developments in relation to controlling the reservoir of bTB in the GB badger population.

Do badgers give TB to cattle?

Although both badgers and cattle have been shown to carry bTB there has been much debate around the transmission of the disease between the two species.

In November 1996, Professor John Krebs and the Independent Review Team began a scientific review on behalf of the Government into the link between bTB and badgers. The Executive Summary of the Group's findings and recommendations is available on the Defra website.

The Krebs group concluded that that “the sum of evidence strongly supports the view that, in Britain, badgers are a significant source of infection in cattle”. The group recognised, however, that scientific data were lacking and recommended that an experiment, the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT), be set up to establish the effect of culling badgers on TB in cattle.

Badger culling in the RBCT has been completed, with some surveying work continuing into 2006. In October 2005, the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB (ISG), who designed the trial, published updated interim analysis (144 KB) on reactive culling data. In December 2005, the ISG published an interim report on the proactive culling element of the trial. The Group’s final report will be published in early 2007.

Public consultation

In December 2005, the Government announced new measures to tackle bTB in England. One of these measures was a public consultation on the culling of badgers for the control of bTB. The consultation, which ran from 15 December 2005 – 10 March 2006, aimed to explain the issues and involve the wider public in the process to decide whether or not to cull badgers and the methods by which this could be done as part of the overall approach to control the spread of bTB in England in cattle.

  • The public consultation closed on 10 March 2006. The consultation documents are still available to view online after this date.

Page Top

 

 

 



New Forest Badger Group  info@newforest-badgers.org 
This website does NOT use cookies.  Optimised for Internet Explorer  Video is Windows Media
All trademarks and / or names are acknowledged and remain the property of their respective owners  © New Forest Badger Group MMVI
  Design